Wikiversity:Babel

Wikiversity:Babel –

Babel

Italiano: Nei limiti del possibile, lasciate i vostri messaggi nella pagina di discussione dell'articolo e inserite in questa pagina solo il link alla discussione.

Français: Dans la mesure du possible, veuillez laisser vos messages dans la page discussion de l'article concerné et n'insérer ici qu'un lien vers ce message.

Svenska: I den mån det är möjligt, vänligen lämna ditt fullständiga meddelande på artikelns diskussionssida, och skriv sedan bara någon enstaka rad här med en länk till meddelandet.

العربية: رجاء اترك رسائلك على صفحة النقاش للمقالة ذات الصلة بالتفاصيل الكاملة، واترك سطرا واحدا فقط هنا مع الرابط إليه.

中文: 请尽量在讨论页发表你的详细意见，只在本页用一行写下你的意见摘要，然后做个链接连到即可。/請儘量在討論頁發表你的詳細意見，只在本頁用一行寫下你的意見摘要，然後做個鏈結連到即可。

Українська: Це багатомовний форум, де можна обговорити будь-які питання, що стосуються beta.wikiversity.org. Україномовний форум українського Віківерситету знаходиться тут — Wikiversity:Кнайпа.

Türkçe: Lütfen yorumlarınızı mümkün olduğunca tüm ayrıntılarla birlikte ilgili maddenin Tartışma sayfasında bırakın ve burada yalnızca konuya bağlantı veren tek bir satır bırakın.

Русский: Здесь находится многоязычный форум, где можно обсудить любые вопросы. По возможности, оставляйте ваши комментарии непосредственно на странице обсуждения соответствующей статьи Вики, а на данной странице помещайте только ссылку туда.

ไทย: การอภิปรายเกี่ยวกับหัวข้อเรื่องใดๆ กรุณาเขียนไว้ที่ หน้าพูดคุย ของเรื่องนั้นๆ และทำลิ้งก์จากหน้านี้ไปสู่หัวข้อเรื่องนั้น โดยเขียนไม่ควรเกินหนึ่งบรรทัด.

Deutsch: Sofern möglich, hinterlasse Deine Nachrichten auf der Diskussionseite des betreffenden Artikels und plaziere hier lediglich einen Link dorthin.

Português: Preferencialmente, deixe suas mensagens na página de discussão do artigo correspondente com os detalhes completos, deixando aqui apenas uma simples linha com link para a mesma.

Беларуская: Калі гэта толькі магчыма, калі ласка, пакідайце свае каментарыі непасрэдна на старонцы «Talk» адпаведнага артыкулу Вікі, а на дадзенай старонцы пакідайце толькі спасылку туды.

فارسی: لطفاً پیغام های خود را با جزئیات کامل در صفحه بحث مربوط به این مقاله قرار دهید و یک خط بنویسید و آن را به پیغام خود لینک کنید

Български: Това е многоезичен форум, в който могат да се обсъждат всякакви въпроси. По възможност, пишете вашите коментарии непосредствено на беседата на съответната статия, а тук поставяйте само връзки до тях.

Dansk: Prøv så vidt muligt at skrive dine beskeder på de relevante artiklers diskussionssider og blot sætte et link til den her.

Ripoarisch: Wann möschlėsh, donn_Dinge Bëijdraach op dė Klaaf_Sigk fun_däm_Atikkel wo_t_dröm_jëijd, un pak_hee enne Lėngk_drop henn.

日本語: くわしい話はなるべく関連するページのノートに書いておき、ここにはそこへのリンクを添えた1行程度のメッセージだけを残すようにお願いします。

Српски / srpski: Уколико је то могуће, коментаре остављајте на одговарајућим страницама за разговор дотичних чланака, а овдје на страници за разговор можете ставити само везу ка Вашем коментару.

Slovenščina: Kolikor je le mogoče, pustite svoja sporočila z vsemi podrobnostmi na pogovorni strani ustreznega članka, tu pa naj ostane le vrstica s povezavo nanjo.

Norsk: Så langt det lar seg gjørem, skriv din beskjed på den relevante diskusjonssiden, og skriv kun ei linje som referer dit herfra.

Polski: Dopóki to możliwe, rozbudowane wiadomości prosimy umieszczać na stronach dyskusyjnych omawianych artykułów lub tematów, a w tym miejscu dodawać jedynie jednolinijkową adnotację z linkiem do dyskusji.

Occitan: Dins la mesura del possible, daissar vòstres messatges dins la pagina discutida de l'article concernat e inserir aquí pas qu'un ligam vèrs aqueste messatge.

Nederlands: Laat je gedetailleerde berichten zo veel mogelijk achter op de overlegpagina van het betreffende artikel en hier een enkele regel met een verwijzing daar naar toe.

Español: En tanto sea posible, coloca tu mensaje en la página de discusión del artículo concerniente, y deja aquí solamente una línea con un enlace hacia el mismo.

Galego: Se for posible deixe as súas mensaxes na páxina de conversa do artigo correspondente, insira nesta páxina só a ligazón cara a esa mensaxe

Čeština: Pokud je to možné, zanechte detailní zprávu na diskuzní stránce příslušnéhoho článku a sem dejte jen jednoduché vysvětlení s odkazem.

한국어: 가능하면 개별 문서의 토론 페이지에 내용을 작성하시고, 여기에는 토론 페이지의 링크와 함께 간단한 언급만 남겨주세요.

English: As far as possible, please leave your messages on the Talk page of a relevant article with full details, and leave just a single line here with a link to it.

Esperanto: Laŭeble metu vian plenan mesaĝon en la diskuton de la koncerna artikolo kaj jen nur unu linion kun ligo tien!

Brezhoneg: E kement ha ma c'hallit en ober, laoskit ho kemennadennoù war bajenn gaozeal ar pennad zo e kaoz, ha na skrivit amañ nemet ur gerig displegañ gant ul liamm.

Ελληνικά: Όσο αυτό είναι δυνατόν, παρακαλούμε αφήστε τα μηνύματά σας στη Σελίδα Συζήτησης του σχετικού άρθρου με πλήρεις λεπτομέρειες και απλώς αφήστε εδώ έναν σύνδεσμο.

Discussion archive

/archive

Install Extension:Translate

Hi, please let me know the detailed steps to have Extension:Translate installed on this Wiki, if a vote must happen, where and how should I launch it? --Psychoslave (talk) 20:38, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Hello I am in favor would be of great help (installation request will then be made on phabricator:), however, it is possible that no one has responded? --Samuele2002 (talk) 08:24, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Crochet.david What do you think? Two opinions are not sufficient to make the request. As for the extension I'm translations administrator on Meta and Wikispeicies so I know how it works and I would be willing to rearrange the pages to the extension (Page X/en should be moved to X prepared and marked for translation (+Tag translate etc ....) and then with Special:PageMigration connect the various language versions to eN). Of course they will make any change but nothing excessive. (But will in most cases remove the base page to allow the moving sub page in English so I could use the flag of admin to do all these tasks. In anticipation of this, and still my desire to help out more here I request here to be Custodianship. --Samuele2002 (talk) 00:27, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Crochet.david? --Samuele2002 (Chiedi pure!) 20:05, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

For make changing the configuration of betawikiversity, a vote is need. knowing that the extension needing is for betawikiversity and not for a specific language, because the day the project will be independent, the extension installed will no longer serve. So the question is : is the extension used for betawikiversity or is it used for the Esperanto section ? Crochet.david (talk) 21:24, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

I favor the installation of the extension for the project not for a Esperanto section for translate pages help, guidelines and replace those esistensi because right now there is not an order, then it is very hindered reading guidelines from introductory texts pretty basic page. --Samuele2002 (Chiedi pure!) 18:11, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Support If possibilities are open. Why Can we not installed it.--Jayprakash (talk) 00:32, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

I support this proposal.

Vito Genovese 14:13, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Request on Phabricator --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 21:05, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

I inform you that I will start to move subpages translated the tiny initial pages (eg /It ->/it /Fr -> /fr) to make them compatible with the extension translate. --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 13:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Quick question: Are we going to keep a central main page in English and the translations thereof provided by the Translate extension? Or are we going to keep our independent main pages?

Vito Genovese 13:23, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

@Vito Genovese: I say we put the page in English as the primary and the other subpages of it and dependent on it or we do not understand anything. In fact, then I will move the subpage in English on the main page by deleting the contents of it (eg Wikiversity:About/En move to Wikiversity:About after deleting the content Wikiversity:About). --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 14:16, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Main page may be specific language indication (before independant) but after creation of the specific wikiversity, the main page may be similar. How to handle this with the translation extension ? Crochet.david (talk) 21:32, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

I have visited several WMF wikis where Translate is enabled, and have not come across a single wiki where the Translate is used for the Main Page. Come to think of it, each language project that we host here has varying qualities, and having a uniform main page is not the best idea.

I think we should be conservative about the use of Translate, and tag pages sparingly. Even though I am a fan of the extension, I believe it could get out of hand, and make everything English-centric around here. {{Browse}} has allowed us NOT to recognize a default language for Beta, and Translate might change that.

Vito Genovese 22:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

The problem is that using {{ Browse}} reading pages is made difficult because they are sub-pages and is not immediately reach them from the home page given. They may at this point with this method at the end of the various subpages have in almost all cases the usual content. If you see incubator even there the extension for the pages is used. Yes have a page in a specific language to be used in the future Wikiversity think it is important but this would not be limited extension Tranlsate because anyway we should follow the criteria for when to mark a page as to translate it or not. However, a translated page is not necessarily the base page is in English can be in any language supported by the extension. And I would say that the service pages that will serve in the new Wikiversity should be like subpage of CODE LANGUAGE/Wikiversity in the local language: PAGENAME as is done on incubator and also because then the next export to the new Wikiversity along with this I would feel it would be easier what do you think if you follow the Incubator model that is to have all the pages in a language as subpages language code as it is one of the failings alleged during the closure proposal beta.Wikiversity. --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 10:23, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

@Samuele2002: I agree with you on the unpracticality of {{Browse}}, which I had mentioned while writing my previous post, but apparently removed before posting it. You are also right about the possibility of translating source pages in other languages, but it should be quite rare, since English is the only true lingua franca of our age. Anyway, let's wait for the folks at Phabricator to enable it, and see how the experience will go.

Vito Genovese 11:29, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

The extension is installed now will take a while 'to get ready to mark pages for translation. if someone wants to help is welcome :) --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 23:44, 21 March 2017 (UTC)

Hey I changed my rights. If anybody objections on it. Please informe me.--Jayprakash (talk) 03:17, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

I'd like to help, if that's alright. Let's get busy! :)

Vito Genovese 06:44, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Great. Crochet.david you assign the flag of translation administrator to Vito Genovese. I recommend you wait to mark a page as to translate the meantime moved subpages are translated to lower case as marking a page as to translate the sub-pages in different languages ​​become unchangeable. --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 12:45, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Please you see mw:Special:MyLanguage/Help:Extension:Translate/Page translation administration --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 12:51, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

@Samuele2002: Sure, just tell us when you are done. By the way, "translation administrator" can be assigned by admins as well. See Special:UserRights/Vito_Genovese for instance. :)

Vito Genovese 13:07, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

@Vito Genovese: No administrators can only add and remove yourself as a translation administrator but can not add or remove it to other users. --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 19:35, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

@Samuele2002:: Thank you. :) I realized it after posting the above message, but a little too late. :)

Vito Genovese 19:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

 :) --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 19:48, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Update Wikiversity logo

Hi! I notice that the current logo has the "dome" sort of facing down, as if it were a giant sphere rising from behind the building, rather than a dome sitting on top of the building. Therefore, I propose a new version of the logo (created by Julian Herzog). This new version also has the gradients removed, because they don't really add anything here. What do you think? Any support? Any objections? --Felipe (talk) 22:09, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Support Excellent work! A great improvement :) --Joseraeiro (talk) 22:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Support I really like the logo --Samuele2002 (talk) 23:33, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

Better if the thickness of the line of latitude is the same as the line of longitude. Crochet.david (talk) 05:31, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

@Crochet.david: Julian Herzog updated the logo making the lines of the same thickness. Is it ok now? --Felipe (talk) 12:48, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

SupportCrochet.david (talk) 15:35, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Support Support. At last! It would be a significant improvement at any rate. --pegasovagante (tell me) 08:40, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Support I think it'll be way better with the horizontal lines more light blue, not dark... --Martinligabue (talk) 12:40, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

I don't see dark line ? Crochet.david (talk) 16:26, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Support --M.shady (talk) 11:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

I inform you that the community of it.wikiversity (including Martinligabue and pegasovagante) supports the new logo --Samuele2002 (talk) 14:31, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Support -Jayprakash (talk) 20:59, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Support but with one change I would like to see more of the WMF blue–green–red color scheme. Maybe just change it to look like "Wikiversity"? Or if you really want to be ambitious, make stripes in the globe red and green? What does everyone else think? Koavf (talk) 21:45, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Hm, the logo has many elements so there are many ways to color it, of which coloring the words or the stripes are just two. Reaching consensus on a colored version of the logo will be very difficult, and there's no need for it, so I'm currently against adding color. --Felipe (talk) 00:32, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

You can not change so much a meta community decision ? Crochet.david (talk) 08:18, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

@Crochet.david: Of course we can. en.wikt changed their logo about four months ago. Koavf (talk) 09:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

It's not because one do it that all can do it. Crochet.david (talk) 09:21, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

I would have to leave only blue --Samuele2002 (talk) 13:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

This decision will change at least 15 logos. Betawikiversity is not the place for. It is on metawiki that this decision must be taken.Crochet.david (talk) 13:34, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Support --Atcovi (talk) 13:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Support Cleaner and nicer. Amqui (talk) 15:13, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Support --Thierry613 (talk) 19:04, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Support --Guy vandegrift (talk) 17:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Sorry if it's late, but I also Support the new logo. The principle "Keep It Simple" is a must when it comes to a logo. --Zerabat (talk) 22:22, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Support --Hubertl (talk) 19:32, 3 April 2017 (UTC)

Well it's been a month and there's nothing but support, so I think that counts as consensus. I just contacted Julian Herzog to see if he can do some localized versions of the logo so that we can request the replacements at Phabricator. Let me know if anyone knows of any better way to deploy the logo. Thanks for participating! --Felipe (talk) 12:03, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Right, I think I've done the whole bunch. See File:Wikiversity logo 2017.svg for the version without text, the others are all linked as other versions there. I have used Gill Sans bold as the font since that appears to be the Wikimedia guideline. Please check if they look ok, especially but not exclusively the ones that do not use the Latin alphabet as I had to improvise somewhat for these and as I am not very familiar especially with the Korean and Japanese symbols. Also, thank you for the friendly and constructive comments! --Julian Herzog (talk) 11:15, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Julian! I compared one by one the text of your logos with those of the current logos. They all look perfect. However, I noticed that the German and Japanese Wikiversities both have their current logos with English text, rather than their own languages. Therefore, I'm thinking on requesting that those logos are updated to the English version, rather than the localized versions. If those communities then want to update their logos to the localized versions, they can start a Phabricator task for it. Any thoughts? --Felipe (talk) 14:25, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank you, I agree, I just thought I'd give them the option to choose which version they want to use. --Julian Herzog (talk) 14:41, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

I requested the update of the logo, check phab:T160491 and subscribe! --Felipe (talk) 02:33, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

But, why in new logo have only one color?? With blue gradation was better.. --— Green Zero обг 20:55, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

The new logo has been deployed on all Wikiversities. Thanks everyone!!! --Felipe (talk) 20:33, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks :) --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 16:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Review of initial updates on Wikimedia movement strategy process

Note: Apologies for cross-posting and sending in English. Message is available for translation on Meta-Wiki.

The Wikimedia movement is beginning a movement-wide strategy discussion, a process which will run throughout 2017. For 15 years, Wikimedians have worked together to build the largest free knowledge resource in human history. During this time, we've grown from a small group of editors to a diverse network of editors, developers, affiliates, readers, donors, and partners. Today, we are more than a group of websites. We are a movement rooted in values and a powerful vision: all knowledge for all people. As a movement, we have an opportunity to decide where we go from here.

This movement strategy discussion will focus on the future of our movement: where we want to go together, and what we want to achieve. We hope to design an inclusive process that makes space for everyone: editors, community leaders, affiliates, developers, readers, donors, technology platforms, institutional partners, and people we have yet to reach. There will be multiple ways to participate including on-wiki, in private spaces, and in-person meetings. You are warmly invited to join and make your voice heard.

The immediate goal is to have a strategic direction by Wikimania 2017 to help frame a discussion on how we work together toward that strategic direction.

Regular updates are being sent to the Wikimedia-l mailing list, and posted on Meta-Wiki. Beginning with this message, monthly reviews of these updates will be sent to this page as well. Sign up to receive future announcements and monthly highlights of strategy updates on your user talk page.

Here is a review of the updates that have been sent so far:

• Update 1 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (15 December 2016)
  • Introduction to process and information about budget spending resolution to support it
• Update 2 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (23 December 2016)
  • Start of search for Lead Architect for movement strategy process
• Update 3 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (8 January 2017)
  • Plans for strategy sessions at upcoming Wikimedia Conference 2017
• Update 4 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (11 January 2017)
  • Introduction of williamsworks
• Update 5 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (2 February 2017)
  • The core movement strategy team, team tracks being developed, introduction of the Community Process Steering Committee, discussions at WikiIndaba conference 2017 and the Wikimedia movement affiliates executive directors gathering in Switzerland
• Update 6 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (10 February 2017)
  • Tracks A & B process prototypes and providing feedback, updates on development of all four Tracks

More information about the movement strategy is available on the Meta-Wiki 2017 Wikimedia movement strategy portal.

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation, 20:31, 15 February 2017 (UTC) • Please help translate to your language • Get help

Overview #2 of updates on Wikimedia movement strategy process

Note: Apologies for cross-posting and sending in English. This message is available for translation on Meta-Wiki.

As we mentioned last month, the Wikimedia movement is beginning a movement-wide strategy discussion, a process which will run throughout 2017. This movement strategy discussion will focus on the future of our movement: where we want to go together, and what we want to achieve.

Regular updates are being sent to the Wikimedia-l mailing list, and posted on Meta-Wiki. Each month, we are sending overviews of these updates to this page as well. Sign up to receive future announcements and monthly highlights of strategy updates on your user talk page.

Here is a overview of the updates that have been sent since our message last month:

• Update 7 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (16 February 2017)
  • Development of documentation for Tracks A & B
• Update 8 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (24 February 2017)
  • Introduction of Track Leads for all four audience tracks
• Update 9 on Wikimedia movement strategy process (2 March 2017)
  • Seeking feedback on documents being used to help facilitate upcoming community discussions

More information about the movement strategy is available on the Meta-Wiki 2017 Wikimedia movement strategy portal.

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation, 19:43, 9 March 2017 (UTC) • Please help translate to your language • Get help

IMPORTANT: Admin activity review

Hello,

A policy regarding the removal of "advanced rights" (administrator, bureaucrat, etc. ) was adopted by global community consensus in 2013. According to this policy, the stewards are reviewing administrators' activity on all Wikimedia Foundation wikis with no inactivity policy. To the best of our knowledge, your wiki does not have a formal process for removing "advanced rights" from inactive accounts. This means that the stewards will take care of this according to the admin activity review.

We have determined that the following users meet the inactivity criteria (no edits and no log actions for more than 2 years):

• Abuse filter
  • last edit: —
  • last log action: 2014-10-31
• Darklama
  • last edit: 2014-05-05
  • last log action: 2013-04-15
• Gabrielchihonglee
  • last edit: 2014-04-22
  • last log action: 2014-03-03
• Hillgentleman
  • last edit: 2014-02-20
  • last log action: 2012-09-30

These users will receive a notification soon, asking them to start a community discussion if they want to retain some or all of their rights. If the users do not respond, then their advanced rights will be removed by the stewards.

However, if you as a community would like to create your own activity review process superseding the global one, want to make another decision about these inactive rights holders, or already have a policy that we missed, then please notify the stewards on Meta-Wiki so that we know not to proceed with the rights review on your wiki. Thanks, --MarcoAurelio (talk) 12:12, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

MarcoAurelio, I've created a request for the removal of my admin right on meta, thanks! Gabrielchihonglee (talk) 12:29, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

@Vito Genovese: @Jayprakash12345: @Crochet.david: How about making a policy with removal criteria of the flag of admin? It is now high time that beta.wikiversity has their own policy. --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 07:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I think 1 year is Sufficient to remove inactive Users Admin Flag.--Jayprakash (talk) 07:24, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Also I think 1 year is sufficient --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 12:58, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Agreed.

Vito Genovese 12:58, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

The default rule is two years. It is metawiki that manages the follow-up. To do our own rule is also to follow up on it. Are you thinking about it? Stewards have a good tracking tool. 1 year or 2 years, is this really important for us to apply a rule? Crochet.david (talk) 21:29, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Certainly not important. Would not cause a burden either. Using something like this would to the trick (the date parameter can be kept up-to-date with parser functions). Either way is fine with me.

Vito Genovese 22:24, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

The thing to consider is that beta.Wikiversity is a multilingual project and therefore should have dele autonomous rules without using the Meta rules. Also to give signs of a vibrant community and having the policies decided by the community of beta.Wikiversity. --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 10:28, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

There is virtually no need for a policy deviating from the admin activity review. I am opposed to the idea to establish a local policy. --Vogone (talk) 23:13, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Removed. Matiia (talk) 15:26, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

Matiia Thanks --Samuele2002 (Talk!) 20:53, 16 April 2017 (UTC)

We invite you to join the movement strategy conversation (now through April 15)

This message, "We invite you to join the movement strategy conversation (now through April 15)", was sent through multiple channels by Gregory Varnum on 15 and 16 of March 2017 to village pumps, affiliate talk pages, movement mailing lists, and MassMessage groups. A similar message was sent by Nicole Ebber to organized groups and their mailing lists on 15 of March 2017. This version of the message is available for translation and documentation purposes

Dear Wikimedians/Wikipedians:

Today we are starting a broad discussion to define Wikimedia's future role in the world and develop a collaborative strategy to fulfill that role. You are warmly invited to join the conversation.

There are many ways to participate, by joining an existing conversation or starting your own:

Track A (organized groups): Discussions with your affiliate, committee or other organized group (these are groups that support the Wikimedia movement).

Track B (individual contributors): On Meta or your local language or project wiki.

This is the first of three conversations, and it will run between now and April 15. The purpose of cycle 1 is to discuss the future of the movement and generate major themes around potential directions. What do we want to build or achieve together over the next 15 years?

We welcome you, as we create this conversation together, and look forward to broad and diverse participation from all parts of our movement.

• Find out more about the movement strategy process
• Learn more about volunteering to be a Discussion Coordinator

Sincerely,

Nicole Ebber (Track A Lead), Jaime Anstee (Track B Lead), & the engagement support teams

05:09, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Start of the 2017 Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees elections

Please accept our apologies for cross-posting this message. This message is available for translation on Meta-Wiki.

On behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee, I am pleased to announce that self-nominations are being accepted for the 2017 Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees Elections.

The Board of Trustees (Board) is the decision-making body that is ultimately responsible for the long-term sustainability of the Wikimedia Foundation, so we value wide input into its selection. More information about this role can be found on Meta-Wiki. Please read the letter from the Board of Trustees calling for candidates.

The candidacy submission phase will last from April 7 (00:00 UTC) to April 20 (23:59 UTC).

We will also be accepting questions to ask the candidates from April 7 to April 20. You can submit your questions on Meta-Wiki.

Once the questions submission period has ended on April 20, the Elections Committee will then collate the questions for the candidates to respond to beginning on April 21.

The goal of this process is to fill the three community-selected seats on the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees. The election results will be used by the Board itself to select its new members.

The full schedule for the Board elections is as follows. All dates are inclusive, that is, from the beginning of the first day (UTC) to the end of the last.

• April 7 (00:00 UTC) – April 20 (23:59 UTC) – Board nominations
• April 7 – April 20 – Board candidates questions submission period
• April 21 – April 30 – Board candidates answer questions
• May 1 – May 14 – Board voting period
• May 15–19 – Board vote checking
• May 20 – Board result announcement goal

In addition to the Board elections, we will also soon be holding elections for the following roles:

• Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC)
  • There are five positions being filled. More information about this election will be available on Meta-Wiki.

• Funds Dissemination Committee Ombudsperson (Ombuds)
  • One position is being filled. More information about this election will be available on Meta-Wiki.

Please note that this year the Board of Trustees elections will be held before the FDC and Ombuds elections. Candidates who are not elected to the Board are explicitly permitted and encouraged to submit themselves as candidates to the FDC or Ombuds positions after the results of the Board elections are announced.

More information on this year's elections can be found on Meta-Wiki. Any questions related to the election can be posted on the election talk page on Meta-Wiki, or sent to the election committee's mailing list, board-electionswikimedia.org.

On behalf of the Election Committee,
Katie Chan, Chair, Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee
Joe Sutherland, Community Advocate, Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee, 03:37, 7 April 2017 (UTC) • Please help translate to your language • Get help

Read-only mode for 20 to 30 minutes on 19 April and 3 May

Read this message in another language • Please help translate to your language

The Wikimedia Foundation will be testing its secondary data center in Dallas. This will make sure that Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia wikis can stay online even after a disaster. To make sure everything is working, the Wikimedia Technology department needs to conduct a planned test. This test will show whether they can reliably switch from one data center to the other. It requires many teams to prepare for the test and to be available to fix any unexpected problems.

They will switch all traffic to the secondary data center on Wednesday, 19 April 2017. On Wednesday, 3 May 2017, they will switch back to the primary data center.

Unfortunately, because of some limitations in MediaWiki, all editing must stop during those two switches. We apologize for this disruption, and we are working to minimize it in the future.

You will be able to read, but not edit, all wikis for a short period of time.

• You will not be able to edit for approximately 20 to 30 minutes on Wednesday, 19 April and Wednesday, 3 May. The test will start at 14:00 UTC (15:00 BST, 16:00 CEST, 10:00 EDT, 07:00 PDT, 23:00 JST, and in New Zealand at 02:00 NZST on Thursday 20 April and Thursday 4 May).
• If you try to edit or save during these times, you will see an error message. We hope that no edits will be lost during these minutes, but we can't guarantee it. If you see the error message, then please wait until everything is back to normal. Then you should be able to save your edit. But, we recommend that you make a copy of your changes first, just in case.

Other effects:

• Background jobs will be slower and some may be dropped. Red links might not be updated as quickly as normal. If you create an article that is already linked somewhere else, the link will stay red longer than usual. Some long-running scripts will have to be stopped.
• There will be code freezes for the weeks of 17 April 2017 and 1 May 2017. Non-essential code deployments will not happen.

This project may be postponed if necessary. You can read the schedule at wikitech.wikimedia.org. Any changes will be announced in the schedule. There will be more notifications about this. Please share this information with your community. /User:Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk)

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:33, 11 April 2017 (UTC)

Voting has begun in 2017 Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees elections

This is a message from the Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee. Translations are available.

Voting has begun for eligible voters in the 2017 elections for the Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees.

The Wikimedia Foundation Board of Trustees is the ultimate governing authority of the Wikimedia Foundation, a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization registered in the United States. The Wikimedia Foundation manages many diverse projects such as Wikipedia and Commons.

The voting phase lasts from 00:00 UTC May 1 to 23:59 UTC May 14. Click here to vote. More information on the candidates and the elections can be found on the 2017 Board of Trustees election page on Meta-Wiki.

On behalf of the Elections Committee,
Katie Chan, Chair, Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee
Joe Sutherland, Community Advocate, Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery • Translate • Get help

19:14, 3 May 2017 (UTC)

Beta Feature Two Column Edit Conflict View

From May 9, the Two Column Edit Conflict View will be available as a beta feature on all wikis. The Two Column Edit Conflict View is a new interface for the edit conflict resolution page. It highlights differences between the editor's and the conflicting changes to make it easy to copy and paste pieces of the text and resolve the conflict. The feature fulfils a request for a more user-friendly edit conflict resolution from the German Community’s Technical Wishlist. Everyone is invited to test the feature and we hope that it will serve you well!

Birgit Müller (WMDE) 14:29, 8 May 2017 (UTC)

Editing News #1—2017

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Did you know?

Did you know that you can review your changes visually?

When you are finished editing the page, type your edit summary and then choose "Review your changes".

In visual mode, you will see additions, removals, new links, and formatting highlighted. Other changes, such as changing the size of an image, are described in notes on the side.

Click the toggle button to switch between visual and wikitext diffs.

The wikitext diff is the same diff tool that is used in the wikitext editors and in the page history. You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has spent most of their time supporting the 2017 wikitext editor mode which is available inside the visual editor as a Beta Feature, and adding the new visual diff tool. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. You can find links to the work finished each week at mw:VisualEditor/Weekly triage meetings. Their current priorities are fixing bugs, supporting the 2017 wikitext editor as a beta feature, and improving the visual diff tool.

Recent changes

• A new wikitext editing mode is available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices. The 2017 wikitext editor has the same toolbar as the visual editor and can use the citoid service and other modern tools. Go to Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-betafeatures to enable the New wikitext mode.
• A new visual diff tool is available in VisualEditor's visual mode. You can toggle between wikitext and visual diffs. More features will be added to this later. In the future, this tool may be integrated into other MediaWiki components. [1]
• The team have added multi-column support for lists of footnotes. The <references /> block can automatically display long lists of references in columns on wide screens. This makes footnotes easier to read. You can request multi-column support for your wiki. [2]
• You can now use your web browser's function to switch typing direction in the new wikitext mode. This is particularly helpful for RTL language users like Urdu or Hebrew who have to write JavaScript or CSS. You can use Command+Shift+X or Control+Shift+X to trigger this. [3]
• The way to switch between the visual editing mode and the wikitext editing mode is now consistent. There is a drop-down menu that shows the two options. This is now the same in desktop and mobile web editing, and inside things that embed editing, such as Flow. [4]
• The Categories item has been moved to the top of the Page options menu (from clicking on the "hamburger" icon) for quicker access. [5] There is also now a "Templates used on this page" feature there. [6]
• You can now create <chem> tags (sometimes used as <ce>) for chemical formulas inside the visual editor. [7]
• Tables can be set as collapsed or un-collapsed. [8]
• The Special character menu now includes characters for Canadian Aboriginal Syllabics and angle quotation marks (‹› and ⟨⟩) . The team thanks the volunteer developer, Tpt. [9]
• A bug caused some section edit conflicts to blank the rest of the page. This has been fixed. The team are sorry for the disruption. [10]
• There is a new keyboard shortcut for citations: Control+Shift+K on a PC, or Command+Shift+K on a Mac. It is based on the keyboard shortcut for making links, which is Control+K or Command+K respectively. [11]

Future changes

• The team is working on a syntax highlighting tool. It will highlight matching pairs of <ref> tags and other types of wikitext syntax. You will be able to turn it on and off. It will first become available in VisualEditor's built-in wikitext mode, maybe late in 2017. [12]
• The kind of button used to Show preview, Show changes, and finish an edit will change in all WMF-supported wikitext editors. The new buttons will use OOjs UI. The buttons will be larger, brighter, and easier to read. The labels will remain the same. You can test the new button by editing a page and adding &ooui=1 to the end of the URL, like this: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Project:Sandbox?action=edit&ooui=1 The old appearance will no longer be possible, even with local CSS changes. [13]
• The outdated 2006 wikitext editor will be removed later this year. It is used by approximately 0.03% of active editors. See a list of editing tools on mediawiki.org if you are uncertain which one you use. [14]
• If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thank you!

—Elitre (WMF)

18:07, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

RevisionSlider

RevisionSlider will be available as a default feature for all users on all wikis from May 17. The RevisionSlider adds a slider view to the diff page so that you can easily move between revisions. The slider view is collapsed by default, and will load by clicking on it. It can also be turned off entirely in the user preferences. RevisionSlider has been a default feature on German, Arabic and Hebrew Wikipedia for 6 months and a beta feature on all wikis for 8 months. The feature fulfills a wish from the German Community’s Technical Wishlist. Thanks to everyone who tested RevisionSlider and gave valuable feedback to improve the feature! We hope that RevisionSlider will continue to serve you well in your work.

Birgit Müller (WMDE) 14:39, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Join the next cycle of Wikimedia movement strategy discussions (underway until June 12)

Message is available for translation on Meta-Wiki

The Wikimedia movement strategy core team and working groups have completed reviewing the more than 1800 thematic statements we received from the first discussion. They have identified 5 themes that were consistent across all the conversations - each with their own set of sub-themes. These are not the final themes, just an initial working draft of the core concepts.

You are invited to join the online and offline discussions taking place on these 5 themes. This round of discussions will take place between now and June 12th. You can discuss as many as you like; we ask you to participate in the ones that are most (or least) important to you.

Here are the five themes, each has a page on Meta-Wiki with more information about the theme and how to participate in that theme's discussion:

• Healthy, Inclusive Communities
• The Augmented Age
• A Truly Global Movement
• The Most Respected Source of Knowledge
• Engaging in the Knowledge Ecosystem

On the movement strategy portal on Meta-Wiki, you can find more information about each of these themes, their discussions, and how to participate.

Posted by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation • Please help translate to your language • Get help

21:08, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Add user groups to Autopatrollers and Rollbackers

I propose to add two user groups: Autopatrollers and Rollbackers both groups are used in so many wikis and are very useful.

Autopatrollers Rights:

• autopatrol

Rollbackers Rights:

• autopatrol
• rolback

Both groups can be added and removed by administrators. What do you think? - Samuele2002 (Talk!) 11:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Why not. Crochet.david (talk) 15:00, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

Start of the 2017 Wikimedia Foundation Funds Dissemination Committee elections

Translations of this message are available on Meta-Wiki.

On behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee, we are pleased to announce that self-nominations are being accepted for the 2017 Wikimedia Foundation Funds Dissemination Committee and Funds Dissemination Committee Ombudsperson elections. Please read the letter from the Wikimedia Foundation calling for candidates at on the 2017 Wikimedia Foundation elections portal.

Funds Dissemination Committee
The Funds Dissemination Committee (FDC) makes recommendations about how to allocate Wikimedia movement funds to eligible entities. There are five positions being filled. More information about this role can be found at the FDC elections page.

Funds Dissemination Committee Ombudsperson
The Funds Dissemination Committee Ombudsperson receives complaints and feedback about the FDC process, investigates complaints at the request of the Board of Trustees, and summarizes the investigations and feedback for the Board of Trustees on an annual basis. One position is being filled. More information about this role can be found at the FDC Ombudsperson elections page.

The candidacy submission phase will last until May 28 (23:59 UTC).

We will also be accepting questions to ask the candidates until May 28. You can submit your questions on Meta-Wiki. Once the questions submission period has ended on May 28, the Elections Committee will then collate the questions for the candidates to respond to.

The goal of this process is to fill the five community-selected seats on the Wikimedia Foundation Funds Dissemination Committee and the community-selected ombudsperson. The election results will be used by the Board itself to make the appointments.

The full schedule for the FDC elections is as follows. All dates are inclusive, that is, from the beginning of the first day (UTC) to the end of the last.

• May 15 (00:00 UTC) – May 28 (23:59 UTC) – Nominations
• May 15 – May 28 – Candidates questions submission period
• May 29 – June 2 – Candidates answer questions
• June 3 – June 11 – Voting period
• June 12–14 – Vote checking
• June 15 – Goal date for announcing election results

More information on this year's elections can be found at the 2017 Wikimedia Foundation elections portal.

Please feel free to post a note about the election on your project's village pump. Any questions related to the election can be posted on the talk page on Meta-Wiki, or sent to the election committee's mailing list, board-electionswikimedia.org.

On behalf of the Election Committee,
Katie Chan, Chair, Wikimedia Foundation Elections Committee
Joe Sutherland, Community Advocate, Wikimedia Foundation

Posted by the MediaWiki message delivery • Translate • Get help

21:06, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Upgrading Quiz extension

Quiz extension is currently being upgraded while the bugs are begin fixed.Some features that were requested on Extension_talk:Quiz needs community consensus.

1.Upgrading feedback to be conditional.Currently feedback is shown for all questions in quiz and for all proposals/answer. More information at Phabricator - T166931

2.Color scheme for wrong and correct answers.Currently if a question is unanswered or incorrectly answered, the right and wrong options both are highlighted in same color(i.e red). It has been reported at Link and Help_talk:Quiz. The color scheme can be changed or the correct proposals/answers can be highlighted in green. More information at Phabricator - T165387

Updated discussion about merging with Incubator

The old Meta discussion about merging this site with Incubator was closed on procedural grounds, for being vague and dated. However active small-wiki maintainers, translation coordinators, and incubator devs would still like to find a way to make the incubator an effective home for all sister projects. A new proposal was posted, focused on this: Move Beta Wikiversity to Incubator 2.

Please comment and share your perspectives. @Crochet.david: @Samuele2002: @MarcoAurelio: @Vito Genovese: please also help notify other active editors here who I have missed. (The active edits on the number theory page make this hard to see...)

Warmly, Sj (talk) 16:05, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

LangCom rejected this proposal because of (a) a lack of consensus supporting it, and (b) a potential future revamping of the incubation process within the WMF world. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:31, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Accessible editing buttons

The MediaWiki developers have been slowly improving the accessibility of the user interface. The next step in this transition will change the appearance of some buttons and may break some outdated (non-updated or unmaintained) user scripts and gadgets.

You can see and use the old and new versions now. Most editors will only notice that some buttons are slightly larger and have different colors.

• Comparison of old and new styles
• 

  Buttons before the change

• 

  Buttons after the change

However, this change also affects some user scripts and gadgets. Unfortunately, some of them may not work well in the new system. If you maintain any user scripts or gadgets that are used for editing, please see mw:Contributors/Projects/Accessible editing buttons for information on how to test and fix your scripts. Outdated scripts can be tested and fixed now.

This change will probably reach this wiki on Tuesday, 1 August 2017. Please leave a note at mw:Talk:Contributors/Projects/Accessible editing buttons if you need help.

--Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 16:56, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Changes to the global ban policy

Hello. Some changes to the community global ban policy have been proposed. Your comments are welcome at m:Requests for comment/Improvement of global ban policy. Please translate this message to your language, if needed. Cordially. Matiia (Matiia) 00:34, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

New print to pdf feature for mobile web readers

New print to pdf feature for mobile web readers

The Readers web team will be deploying a new feature this week to make it easier to download PDF versions of articles on the mobile website.

Providing better offline functionality was one of the highlighted areas from the research done by the New Readers team in Mexico, Nigeria, and India. The teams created a prototype for mobile PDFs which was evaluated by user research and community feedback. The prototype evaluation received positive feedback and results, so development continued.

For the initial deployment, the feature will be available to Google Chrome browsers on Android. Support for other mobile browsers to come in the future. For Chrome, the feature will use the native Android print functionality. Users can choose to download a webpage as a PDF. Mobile print styles will be used for these PDFs to ensure optimal readability for smaller screens.

The feature is available starting Wednesday, Nov 15. For more information, see the project page on MediaWiki.org.

Thank you!

CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 22:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

States of Wikiversities

All:

I've started on an update of this page, in particular:

• Reverting one piece of several-month-old vandalism
• Running headers and footers out to the end of 2017
• Moving Hindi from the Beta table to the "open Wikiversities" table
• Checking if status has changed on any Meta requests (none changed, though I'm probably going to put through Albanian and Romanian as eligible shortly)
• Starting to update contributions through November 2017. I only counted named contributors, not "anonymous", and I ignored bots. (This is consistent with the way LangCom evaluates projects for approval. Still, please let me know if I should have included bots.)

I have not updated localization statistics nor number of pages, because I don't know what criteria you are using for these columns. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:33, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Update (March 2018)

• It's evident to me that the localization statistics referred to the MediaWiki (most important messages) group. So those figures are now updated.
• Headers and footers have run out to March 2018. Contributions are updated through year-end 2017, and I will start updating them again after 31 March.

  The "open Wikiversities" table is completely updated through March 2018.

• I marked Albanian and Romanian as eligible on Meta.
• I note that the number of pages are taken from an expensive magic word call, so don't require manual updating.

StevenJ81 (talk) 19:42, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Update (July 2018)

I am continuing to maintain this page. I am going to propose the following change:

• The requests on meta for Sinhale Wikiversity and Tamil Wikiversity were rejected as stale. That means that even though someone opened a formal request for these projects on Meta, no one has really created any content. I would propose removing those two from the table.
• I would remove any other language that is rejected on those grounds in the future.
• Languages with 0 pages but already marked as "eligible" probably will not be changed, and I will leave those in place.

StevenJ81 (talk) 14:25, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Editing News #1—2018

Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Did you know?

Did you know that you can now use the visual diff tool on any page?

Sometimes, it is hard to see important changes in a wikitext diff. This screenshot of a wikitext diff (click to enlarge) shows that the paragraphs have been rearranged, but it does not highlight the removal of a word or the addition of a new sentence.

If you enable the Beta Feature for "Visual differences", you will have a new option. It will give you a new box at the top of every diff page. This box will let you choose either diff system on any edit.

Click the toggle button to switch between visual and wikitext diffs.

In the visual diff, additions, removals, new links, and formatting changes will be highlighted. Other changes, such as changing the size of an image, are described in notes on the side.

This screenshot shows the same edit as the wikitext diff. The visual diff highlights the removal of one word and the addition of a new sentence.

You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team has spent most of their time supporting the 2017 wikitext editor mode, which is available inside the visual editor as a Beta Feature, and improving the visual diff tool. Their work board is available in Phabricator. You can find links to the work finished each week at mw:VisualEditor/Weekly triage meetings. Their current priorities are fixing bugs, supporting the 2017 wikitext editor, and improving the visual diff tool.

Recent changes

• The 2017 wikitext editor is available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices. It has the same toolbar as the visual editor and can use the citoid service and other modern tools. The team have been comparing the performance of different editing environments. They have studied how long it takes to open the page and start typing. The study uses data for more than one million edits during December and January. Some changes have been made to improve the speed of the 2017 wikitext editor and the visual editor. Recently, the 2017 wikitext editor opened fastest for most edits, and the 2010 WikiEditor was fastest for some edits. More information will be posted at mw:Contributors/Projects/Editing performance.
• The visual diff tool was developed for the visual editor. It is now available to all users of the visual editor and the 2017 wikitext editor. When you review your changes, you can toggle between wikitext and visual diffs. You can also enable the new Beta Feature for "Visual diffs". The Beta Feature lets you use the visual diff tool to view other people's edits on page histories and Special:RecentChanges. [15]
• Wikitext syntax highlighting is available as a Beta Feature for both the 2017 wikitext editor and the 2010 wikitext editor. [16]
• The citoid service automatically translates URLs, DOIs, ISBNs, and PubMed id numbers into wikitext citation templates. It is very popular and useful to editors, although it can be a bit tricky to set up. Your wiki can have this service. Please read the instructions. You can ask the team to help you enable citoid at your wiki.

Let's work together

• The team will talk about editing tools at an upcoming Wikimedia Foundation metrics and activities meeting.
• Wikibooks, Wikiversity, and other communities may have the visual editor made available by default to contributors. If your community wants this, then please contact Dan Garry.
• The <references /> block can automatically display long lists of references in columns on wide screens. This makes footnotes easier to read. You can request multi-column support for your wiki. [17]
• If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly. We will notify you when the next issue is ready for translation. Thank you!

—Elitre (WMF)

20:56, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Chinese Wikiversity

As far as I can tell, the main thing holding this project back from approval is the fact that the vast majority of the work on it is being done by IP editors, not registered editors. Is there a reason that some of the participants there cannot/do not register. We'd like to be able to move this toward approval as an independent project, if possible. For LangCom: StevenJ81 (talk) 19:49, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

I very much hope that contributions made under IP will not be considered as active contributors to the project. Crochet.david (talk) 20:32, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

I think the current Chinese Wikiversity are often occupied by an IP user. Although some content has some value, I think it can also be used alone. In the beta Wikiversity, there are many problems that need to be solved. My idea is to establish, or if not, then you can also move to the Incubator alone, and the beta problem is too big. So I want to do my part to complete the situation. --夢蝶葬花 (talk) 04:21, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Update July 2018

There are now a sufficient number of registered editors involved, so LangCom is now evaluating this project for approval. See m:Requests for new languages/Wikiversity Chinese.

• If people think that there is a problem with some of the content, please say so on the Meta discussion page!
• Otherwise, project will probably be approved seven days from now, if there are no objections.
• I would strongly request the registered editors to keep a close eye on the content of Chinese Wikiversity, both before and (if it happens) after approval.

StevenJ81 (talk) (LangCom clerk) 14:20, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Approval update (13 July)

Congratulations! This project is approved.

• It will undoubtedly take some time to get the new wiki created, so please continue to work here until you are informed that it has happened. See phabricator:T199577.
• It will be very helpful to the people who will export content to the new wiki if the following things happen:

1. All pages belonging to Chinese Wikiversity need to be included in Category:ZH.
2. If there are templates or modules that this project uses that are part of the infrastructure, and that are not included within Category:ZH, please create Category:Infrastructure templates to be exported to Chinese Wikiversity and add those templates or modules to that category.

Thank you. StevenJ81 (talk) 20:37, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

AdvancedSearch

From May 8, AdvancedSearch will be available as a beta feature in your wiki. The feature enhances the search page through an advanced parameters form and aims to make existing search options more visible and accessible for everyone. AdvancedSearch is a project by WMDE Technical Wishes. Everyone is invited to test the feature and we hope that it will serve you well in your work!

Birgit Müller (WMDE) 14:45, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Global preferences are available

Global preferences are now available, you can set them by visiting your new global preferences page. Visit mediawiki.org for information on how to use them and leave feedback. -- Keegan (WMF) (talk)

19:19, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

States of Wikiversities: Removal of Languages with no content and "Rejected" requests on Meta

Hello, all. I've been managing the page States of Wikiversities so that on behalf of LangCom I can keep an eye on projects here that may become ready for approval.

• As you are probably aware, Chinese Wikiversity is likely to be approved tomorrow, subject to an unexpected objection on Meta.

I would propose removing Sinhale and Tamil from the table on this page. They have -0- pages and one page on Beta, respectively, and the requests on Meta were rejected as "stale", because no one ever actually created content. I would also propose to remove any other test that comes to be rejected as "stale" in the future. The reason for that is simple: there is no sense in continuing to track tests that do not really exist.

Thank you for your consideration. StevenJ81 (talk) 13:59, 11 July 2018 (UTC)

No comments, so I am proceeding. StevenJ81 (talk) 17:09, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

Consultation on the creation of a separate user group for editing sitewide CSS/JS

(Please help translate to your language)

Hi all,

I'm preparing a change in who can edit sitewide CSS/JS pages. (These are pages like MediaWiki:Common.css and MediaWiki:Vector.js which are executed in the browser of all readers and editors.) Currently all administrators are able to edit these pages, which poses a serious and unnecessary security risk. Soon, a dedicated, smaller user group will take over this task. Your community will be able to decide who belongs in this group, so this should mean very little change for you. You can find out more and provide feedback at the consultation page on Meta. If you are involved in maintaining CSS/JS code, or policymaking around adminship requests, please give it a look!

Thanks!
Tgr (talk) 08:45, 12 July 2018 (UTC) (via global message delivery)

New user group for editing sitewide CSS/JS

(Please help translate to your language)

Hi all!

To improve the security of our readers and editors, permission handling for CSS/JS pages has changed. (These are pages like MediaWiki:Common.css and MediaWiki:Vector.js which contain code that is executed in the browsers of users of the site.) A new user group, interface-admin, has been created. Starting four weeks from now, only members of this group will be able edit CSS/JS pages that they do not own (that is, any page ending with .css or .js that is either in the MediaWiki: namespace or is another user's user subpage).

You can learn more about the motivation behind the change here.

Please add users who need to edit CSS/JS to the new group (this can be done the same way new administrators are added, by stewards or local bureaucrats). This is a dangerous permission; a malicious user or a hacker taking over the account of a careless interface-admin can abuse it in far worse ways than admin permissions could be abused. Please only assign it to users who need it, who are trusted by the community, and who follow common basic password and computer security practices (use strong passwords, do not reuse passwords, use two-factor authentication if possible, do not install software of questionable origin on your machine, use antivirus software if that's a standard thing in your environment).

Thanks!
Tgr (talk) 13:08, 30 July 2018 (UTC) (via global message delivery)

Proposal to modify incubation processes within the WMF world

There is a proposal being discussed now on Incubator that would change the process for incubating new language versions of projects. See Incubator:Community Portal. While there is no intention to change incubation for Wikisource projects, I think that the proposed approach would apply to Wikiversity projects. I would therefore encourage you to go to that discussion and participate.

Note: My feeling—and I will probably be the arbiter—is that with Chinese Wikiversity now created and independent, the only project remaining here that is active enough to qualify for the first round of incubation domains would be Hebrew Wikiversity. If you are involved in a different test project here, and would like me to consider your project for the first round of such tests, please contact me on my (currently nonexistent) user talk page here on Beta.

I would add: under the circumstances, I am going to move to close the current discussion on Meta about merging Beta into Incubator as "rejected, no consensus". I am not going to permit the topic to be reintroduced until (at minimum): the whole revised incubation approach is settled, and/or the Beta community comes and requests of its own, with strong consensus favoring, to be merged into Incubator. StevenJ81 (talk) 17:23, 6 August 2018 (UTC)

The GFDL license on Commons

This has been posted here because your wiki allows local file uploads. Please help translate to your language.

Commons will no longer allow uploads of photos, paintings, drawings, audio and video that use the GFDL license and no other license. This starts after 14 October. Textbooks, manuals and logos, diagrams and screenshots from GFDL software manuals that only use the GFDL license are still allowed. Files licensed with both GFDL and an accepted license like Creative Commons BY-SA are still allowed.

There is no time limit to move files from other projects to Commons. The licensing date is all that counts. It doesn't matter when the file was uploaded or created. Every wiki that allows local uploads should check if bots, scripts and templates that are used to move files to Commons need to be updated. Also update your local policy documentation if needed.

The decision to allow files that only have a GFDL license, or not allow them, is a decision all wikis can make for themselves. Your wiki can decide to continue allowing the files that Commons will no longer allow after 14 October. If your wiki decides to continue to allow files after 14 October that Commons will no longer allow those files should not be moved to Commons. — Alexis Jazz, distributed by Johan using MassMessage

18:11, 20 September 2018 (UTC)