Talk:Brick and mortar collaboration
Add topicIt is a question of the real accredited schools and institutes? This information for what purpose gathers? S.J. 19:25, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- Well, it is about people from educational institutions in real world who use the different Wikiversities to contribute to learning/help. This can be in form of various en:Learning resources or e.g. help in other form (e.g. sysop activities, ...).
- Purpose of the page is:
- we could use it for media reports (Wikiversity:Reports/En#See_also)
- convince professors/teachers/educators to invest resources at Wikiversity, instead just in their small bureaus, e.g. "See there are so many prof./teachers/educators using WV, why not you?". Quiz examples, en:Category:Quizzes
- Get more funding - e.g. by WMF
- Convince newcomers to stay at WV
- different educators who are already at single WVs could discover new like-minded educators + foster more multi-lingual work over different countries/WVs. ----Erkan Yilmaz uses the Wikiversity:Chat (try) 20:06, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Advancement in reviewing questions
[edit](copy from [1])
At project opening it has been declared:
Eventually, it may become possible for the Wikiversity research community to facilitate publishing of peer-reviewed research reports that would be recognized as a reliable source, able to be cited in sister projects such as Wikipedia and Wikibooks.
I wish to ask, whether there is an advancement in this direction at other language sections of Wikiversity SergeyJ 16:48, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- I don't think there has been any advancement in that area yet. I don't think any Wikiversities have even a decent answer yet as to how Wikiversity can facilitate peer-review. Whether Wikiversity will ever be recognized as a reliable source will probably be up to sister projects to decide. I think the only thing Wikiversity can do is to try to meet some standard that sister projects can accept. I think that might require Wikiversity initiating discussion with other projects on what it can do to become recognized as a reliable source. -- darklama 17:04, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
- Whether and there are in English Wikiversity reviews, researches which could be recognised by authentic sources? (Would like such to become?) Can be eat desire to discuss this point in question from English Wikipedie (me it difficult as I do not know English)? SergeyJ 00:50, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
It seems to me it is the connected question. If we collect the information on teachers and professors it would be good to solve a question reviewing. It seems, even it is more important, than advertising in the press and financing. S.J. 20:08, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
- helpful links:
- en:Wikiversity:Review board
- en:Wikiversity:Requests for proofreading
- Proposal:Develop systems for accuracy review
- Proposal:Tutorials for finding peer-reviewed secondary literature
- Proposal:Journal (A peer-review journal to allow/encourage academics to write Wikipedia articles), ----Erkan Yilmaz uses the Wikiversity:Chat (try) 20:14, 26 March 2010 (UTC)