User talk:Jafeluv

Please do not use the revert tool

The revert tool is for reverting obvious repeated vandalism. Please provide informative edit summaries for your edits, particularly when making deletions of talk page discussion comments of Wikiversity community members. --JWSchmidt 14:57, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

I did. Jafeluv 14:58, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

• What specific "non-public personal information" were you referring to . Whose name and/or e-mail address were you protecting? —Albatross 15:02, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Non-public personal information

Please describe the nature of the "non-public personal information". --JWSchmidt 04:20, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Real names and email addresses of people who have not made that information public. Jafeluv 11:19, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Jafeluv, how do you know that the real names and email addresses are not public? --JWSchmidt 12:33, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

• I am prepared to demonstrate that they are public. Howeer, that's a red herring, since the purpose of posting the direct evidence was to falsify the tortious remarks of SBJ on his user page on the English Wikiversity. —Moulton 00:37, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

Size of the deleted content

It appears that a large amount of content was deleted (oversighted) from this page, but it is claimed that the "private information" was an email address and a name. I never saw any information on that page that was private. If it is true that the name and email address were private, then why was such a large amount of content deleted? --JWSchmidt 14:19, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

As I've said on Matanya's page, if you think the suppression was done against policy you're welcome to ask for a review of the action by an uninvolved party. Jafeluv 15:09, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

• I, for one, would like a review by a high-level official who is answerable to the Board of Trustees of the WMF. —Moulton 00:33, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

It seems more efficient to just undo the disruption of this wiki caused by outside invaders who are unable to justify their actions here. --JWSchmidt 15:29, 18 March 2011 (UTC)