User talk:TeleComNasSprVen

From Wikiversity

Bloody Hell[edit]

In reply to your questions on my talk page, Darklama and SB Johnny were blocked because of the disruptive bans that they imposed in this community's chat channel. In 2008 the Hostile Takeover of Wikiversity started with bans in the community chat channel and spread to years-long disruption of the wiki by Darklama and SB Johnny by means of policy violations, bad blocks and imposition of emergency desyopings when there was no emergency. I acted so as to prevent Darklama and SB Johnny from spreading their disruptive behavior to this wiki. If another Custodian wants to trust Darklama and SB Johnny to not further disrupt this community then another Custodian can remove the blocks. I've seen no evidence that Darklama or SB Johnny will stop disrupting the #wikiversity chat channel and, based on their past misguided actions at the English Language Wikiversity I expect them to spread their disruption to this wiki, so I cannot in good conscience unblock them. I could have given them warning before blocking them here, but instead I gave them the chance to remove the bad ban that Darklama imposed in #wikiversity. Rather than remove that ban, which was imposed without warning and discussion and against consensus, Darklama and SB Johnny simply imposed additional bans. Darklama and SB Johnny have spent years ignoring consensus, violating policy by calling for unjustified blocks and bans against Wikiversity community members, imposing bad blocks and bans, as well as violating Wikiversity policy by imposing emergency desysoppings when when there was no emergency. Darklama and SB Johnny acted against consensus in #wikiversity and went ahead and continued their sickening pattern of disrupting Wikiversity. After their failure to act by consensus in #wikiversity I had no reason to continue playing their game by giving them a warning before blocking them. Their attitude is one of contempt and disrespect for the ideal that Wikiversity is a place for discussion and learning, and their pattern of disruptive behavior led me to suspect that, had I warned them before blocking them, SB Johnny would have blocked me again as he did in 2008, with the reason for the block something like, "until guidelines are agreed upon". "looks like nothing more than mere childish retaliation" <-- Does that mean that you think Darklama and SB Johnny have the right to now disrupt #wikiversity as they did #wikiversity-en in 2008 and 2009? Do you think that Darklama and SB Johnny can be trusted to not spread their misguided and disruptive actions to this wiki? --JWSchmidt 02:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

There you go, TCNSV. I've added my voice to your request for the blocks to be lifted. However, the most important question may be if anyone considers beta.wikiversity worth the trouble. I really don't know. One step at a time. --Abd 03:03, 17 March 2011 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Complaint from Abd[edit]

This is a final warning about editing my Talk page.

You have never requested that I not edit your talk page. You have, instead attempted to claim that it was harassment if I do. It would be harassment if I continued to comment on your talk page in the presence of a request not to do so, and absent some clear necessity. Your threats to alter my comments, and your actual alterations of my comments, are not a request, they are simply bullying.

However, I did request that you not edit my Talk page, on 24 February 2014, and I used the @TeleComNasSprVen hashtag to call your attention to it. However, perhaps you missed it anyway, and thus were unaware of the request when you made this edit, 6 March 2014.

Nevertheless, your failure to observe the request makes this edit to your Talk page necessary, so that it is clear that you received the request.

Do not edit my Talk page. --Abd (talk) 20:06, 10 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

As with all your warnings, which are highly uncivil and without authority, I can and will disregard this completely, because it is not fair you would be allowed to criticize and harass me on my talkpage without my input on yours. Especially the bolding of the last sentence and your signature - it's highly uncivil to shout to another person. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 22:13, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

first and last disclamer[edit]

This message is doubled on 2 pages of discussion of people involved: Ladies and gentlemen. When I receive a request for mediation between two people, who themselves are unable to find a "common ground", I do not go in the delicacy. If I have to intervene to calm the "whining" it will be clear is blocking one month. Now that you connaisser the terminating, is sure to keep you quiet. word to the wise. Crochet.david (talk) 09:01, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I accept the terms and conditions. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 22:13, 11 March 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]