Wikiversity:Candidates for Custodianship/Crochet.david (Bureaucrat)

Crochet.david (Talk | Email | Contribs | SulUtil)
Hi all. I a candidate for bureaucrat status. I know that the status is purely technical because I have also it in fr.wikiversity. I do not have much else to say to this request, and I prefer to answer any questions you have. Crochet.david (talk) 16:22, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support Support[edit]

Support Support Very trusted and experienced custodian. And as a suggester :) Sotiale (Talk·Contribs) 02:59, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Support I appreciate David for his quick reactions. Timboliu (talk) 19:11, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Support A new bureaucrat would be very helpful and this user would be suitable for it very much. Vogone (talk) 20:13, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Support longterm user in WV projects, I trust him... ----Erkan Yilmaz uses the Wikiversity:Chat (try) 14:26, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Support Of course, certo, natuurlijk
Collegiale groeten, Klaas ‌ V 22:10, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Support experienced and cooperative Wikiversist, helped us to establish Slovene Wikiversity — M♦Zaplotnik ^{my contributions} 16:29, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Support He is very experienced and has done a great deal of work contributing throughout a number of wv projects. --mikeu ^talk 23:02, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral[edit]

Oppose[edit]

Questions/comments[edit]

David, you say "purely technical" above, what is your view on the bureaucrat in general? ----Erkan Yilmaz uses the Wikiversity:Chat (try) 14:39, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Implement decisions taken by the community. Crochet.david (talk) 16:16, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
David, the page Wikiversity:Bureaucrats/En seems in its beginning stages. What would you improve on it? ----Erkan Yilmaz uses the Wikiversity:Chat (try) 14:39, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The purpose of this page is purely technical to inform the community of what is going on. If discussions should focus on bureaucrats, there is talk pages for that. Nothing else Crochet.david (talk) 16:16, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
about this request Wikiversity:Candidates for Custodianship/Vogone: I was disappointed, I'd have given him the tools ("no big deal") - I think you know the mentoring model from en.WV with the probation, or ? What is the criteria for you to give someone custodian flag ? ----Erkan Yilmaz uses the Wikiversity:Chat (try) 14:45, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wich tools ? Vogone have no administrator status on betawikiversity. only Importer_tranwiki rights. Otherwise, for my part, the rule is not written, so it's the unanimously. Crochet.david (talk) 16:16, 7 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@Erkan_Yilmaz: Although I'm not candidate, I want to response. Yes, custodian is no big deal. But custodian tools need small experiences. But If He/She feels the need to use the tools, He/She can request it regardless of experiences. In those days, I thought that He didn't have need and enough experiences. Sotiale (Talk·Contribs) 00:42, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think that this request is done. What do you think about it? Sotiale (talk) 06:37, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Closed successful

Done A second request was made to stewards following an extended period of this has been left open and unresolved. Rights now assigned. Looking at the activity of local 'crats, it would appear that there is a significant issue, especially with Sebmol (last edited in 2008). Billinghurst (talk) 12:44, 22 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]