Wikiversity:Candidates for Custodianship/Darklama

From Wikiversity

I (darklama (Talk | Email | Contribs | SulUtil)) am an active member of English Wikiversity and a custodian there. I believe that custodianship is no big deal. I am a custodian on Beta Wikiversity already, but I believe that Beta Wikiversity's policies and processes were not followed when I was granted the tools and I am uncomfortable with that situation. I am nominating myself for two reasons 1) to follow process, and 2) to have the decision of whether I should have access to the custodian tools be one that the Beta Wikiversity community makes. --darklama 17:57, 20 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support :-)[edit]

  • I know Darklama from wiki + chat. He is experienced, and he forgot to mention he is also active on Wikibooks. I trust him. Also to bring this request up now increases the trust. Everyone can see custodian activity here. ----Erkan Yilmaz 18:01, 20 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • OK. Thanks for asking. Thoughtful, helpful and expereinced. <Hillgentleman| ~ | > 19:05, 20 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • I see no problems with this custodian. //Kaj 09:45, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • From experience, Darklama is a highly valued and respected contributor and custodian, with excellent technical skills and sound judgement. Jtneill 13:08, 21 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • "I believe that Beta Wikiversity's policies and processes were not followed" <-- Maybe the process is, "He understands the technical stuff, make him custodian so the rest of us don't hurt ourselves trying to figure this out." --JWSchmidt 04:34, 22 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Or what is commonly called temporary sysop becoming full sysop. What happens here is that temporary custodians who are doing fine are treated as usual custodians. <Hillgentleman| ~ | > 08:04, 22 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      • OK. I just want to be sure there is community consensus for my having the tools, and this looks like the process normally used for establishing community consensus for that. I am not even sure whether I was considered a temporary or full custodian, I guess this can clarify that as well. --darklama 13:21, 22 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Exuberant support. There's not a nicer fellow. -- Thekohser 14:40, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Support, en.wikiversity and beta are closely connected and the experience at the one shows a benefit at the other. Ottava Rima 16:10, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • Per honesty in seeking to reaffirm the community's trust. Juliancolton 20:07, 25 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  • --Viele Grüße Jan Luca (Talk) (Email) 15:44, 26 March 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Neutral :-|[edit]

Oppose :-([edit]


consensus reached over 7 days, continued trust from the community. //Kaj 10:08, 1 April 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]