Wikiversity:Candidates for Custodianship/Sotiale (Bureaucrat)

From Wikiversity

Hello, everyone. It is self-nomination for bureaucrat tools. I want to do volunteer work for our community! I always think that crat absence due to inactivity is very dangerous. Because this situation will cause community inactivity. As you know, Wikiversity BETA is an incubator project. Many contributors visit here and endeavor for establishing each language Wikiversity. Sometimes some users request Custodian tool. But if all crats are inactive, this process have trouble in dealing. Our community have 3 local crats, but 2 crats are inactive.

I know what is bureaucrat works because I have served as bureaucrat in Korean Wikipedia. I have served as custodian in here and deal with deletion and spam almost every day. If you have a question, please give me a question. Thank you and have a good time. --Sotiale (talk) 15:39, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Support Support Support[edit]

  1.  Support Support : fonction purement technique même si très rarement utilisé ici et utilisateur de confiance. I'm too lazy to translate. Crochet.david (talk) 20:16, 26 May 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  2. Support Support : ... Allways there... Good Luck! Yarden (talk) 14:52, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  3. Support Support I completely trust Sotiale although I cannot see any need for a new bureaucrat, honestly (apparently only 1 crat action was necessary since Crochet.david was promoted in February). Anyway, bureaucratship is no big deal. Vogone (talk) 16:13, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  4. Support SupportMZaplotnik my contributions 16:15, 25 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  5. Support Support— I believe that you are a good guy and I hope that you will success. Good luck!--Gabrielchihonglee (talk) 05:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  6. Support Support We contact several times, not bad. --BB9z (talk) 08:25, 11 November 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  7. Support Support active as custodian, and why hasn't this been closed as successful? If there is a problem, please inform. (Single active 'crat might not want to close since supported the candidacy?) --Abd (talk) 15:50, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Neutral Neutral[edit]

Oppose Oppose[edit]


on the meta RfC and EDP issues[edit]

We don't have a collapse template here, apparently, so I will archive this to history and place a link. --Abd (talk) 15:30, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • the section as written: [1].
  • To take home:
  • The meta RfC to close Beta was improperly filed and, as filed, cannot satisfy clear, WMF-adopted policy for project closure. An new process would need to be filed, with, among other things, immediate announcement here, and it is already obvious it would fail. An unsigned link on Babal here, days later, obviously didn't cut it, there was no comment appearing from that. A site notice, a month later, brought in most comments, before then, the RfC was dead. In other words, suggestions that comments be made there caused the RfC to remain open, probably.
  • Beta needs an EDP policy. See the Wikiversity EDP: [2]. I believe that it can be improved for Beta's purposes. --Abd (talk) 15:43, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Above, I requested that anyone with a problem with the appointment of Sotiale as a bureaucrat please inform us. No negative comment appearing, and the only active local bureaucrat having supported this unanimous request, I have requested steward action, at [3]. --Abd (talk) 13:22, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Done. Crochet.david (talk) 17:11, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Thanks all. <Hillgentleman| ~ | > 07:08, 20 February 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]