Wikiversitas:Kebijakan

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of the page Wikiversity:Policies and the translation is 36% complete.
Outdated translations are marked like this.
Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎English • ‎Nederlands • ‎Zazaki • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎français • ‎italiano • ‎svenska • ‎Ελληνικά • ‎български • ‎русский • ‎中文

Komunitas Wikiversitas telah diminta untuk mengembangkan pedoman untuk riset asli yang berlaku di situs web Wikiversitas dalam semua bahasa.

Proposal: Lessen rules about external references

Einstein would be unable to publish his special relativity on Wikiversity. No doubt it is wrong. Also Wikiversity was planned to be modeled after real-world universities and now happens to have stricter rules on original research than real-world universities. It is wrong.

The main trouble is: Wikiversity editors require "Arguments pro and con would need to be supported by additional resources. A single perspective is likely not sufficient." (a quote from Dave Braunschweig at Wikiversity:Help desk). I have not found this rule in the official rules, but Dave has the power to delete and this needs to be dealt with. Need to say about this explicitly in the official rules.

Einstein would be unable to publish at Wikiversity because before publication his work surely was not supported by additional resources. Additional resources appear after some time after publication of a new idea, not before it.

So the world completely lacks a media for publishing new ideas (yes, personal opinions) except of private Web sites. That's bad.

We need a way to publish new ideas and even personal opinions.

We can introduce the following rule: "A personal opinion published at Wikiversity shall be not easily provable to be false by field experts, neither shall it be an unfounded opinion, but shall provide some arguments (but not necessarily proofs) for the opinion)."

Another problem is that when somebody would publish his personal opinion, it is hard for his to follow NPOV, because he is not himself one of his opponents. So we should explicitly state: "Personal opinions can be published as original research. When publishing somebody's opinion as original research, it is allowed to omit opposing views in the hope that these may be added later." --VictorPorton (talk) 18:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

Resolusi komite proyek spesial 2006-39A

SPC merekomendasikan pembuatan beta Proyek Wikiversity, akan dihosting di domain wikiversity.org, sesuai [$ mpp scope|ruang lingkup], mulai Agustus.

Proyek ini akan didedikasikan untuk mengumpulkan sumber daya pendidikan multibahasa gratis, dan untuk mendukung masyarakat menggunakan sumber daya tersebut untuk mengajar dan belajar bersama.

Tahap beta dari proyek ini akan berjalan selama enam bulan, di mana pedoman untuk potensi penggunaan lebih lanjut dari situs, termasuk riset kolaboratif, akan dikembangkan pada beta wiki.

Pedoman ini akan ditinjau oleh SPC pada akhir periode beta. (source|sumber)

Instruksi dari Dewan pada 14 Agustus 2006

(source|sumber, oleh anggota Dewan m:User:Anthere Anthere)

  • "..... pedoman harus dikembangkan, *khususnya* berkenaan dengan riset kolaboratif. Kami berharap pedoman ini sebanyak mungkin dikembangkan di situs beta (khususnya riset kolaboratif), sehingga semua bahasa berbagi tujuan bersama dan beberapa aturan umum yang tidak dapat diabaikan."
  • "Pada akhir periode [beta] 6 bulan ini, proyek akan ditinjau, khususnya sehingga masalah penelitian kolaboratif memenuhi syarat, dan jika mungkin untuk menentukan apakah tahap beta sudah berakhir. Tinjauan akan dilakukan oleh Spc."

Lihat juga

Wikiversity Policies
Research

Research Guidelines
Scope of Research
Review Board

This box: view  talk  edit
  • Kebijakan riset
  • Halaman terkait riset
  • Research-related pages
    • Riset asli - riset yang tidak dipublikasikan menjadi topik menggunakan tinjauan literatur dan/atau metode selain ulasan literatur
    • Riset sekunder - riset dalam suatu topik menggunakan metode tinjauan literatur