维基学院:政策

From Wikiversity
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of the page Wikiversity:Policies and the translation is 36% complete.
Outdated translations are marked like this.
Other languages:
Bahasa Indonesia • ‎English • ‎Nederlands • ‎Zazaki • ‎dansk • ‎español • ‎français • ‎italiano • ‎svenska • ‎Ελληνικά • ‎български • ‎русский • ‎中文

維基學院社群已經呼籲制訂对于原創研究的指引,並適用於所有語言的維基學院網站。

Proposal: Lessen rules about external references

Einstein would be unable to publish his special relativity on Wikiversity. No doubt it is wrong. Also Wikiversity was planned to be modeled after real-world universities and now happens to have stricter rules on original research than real-world universities. It is wrong.

The main trouble is: Wikiversity editors require "Arguments pro and con would need to be supported by additional resources. A single perspective is likely not sufficient." (a quote from Dave Braunschweig at Wikiversity:Help desk). I have not found this rule in the official rules, but Dave has the power to delete and this needs to be dealt with. Need to say about this explicitly in the official rules.

Einstein would be unable to publish at Wikiversity because before publication his work surely was not supported by additional resources. Additional resources appear after some time after publication of a new idea, not before it.

So the world completely lacks a media for publishing new ideas (yes, personal opinions) except of private Web sites. That's bad.

We need a way to publish new ideas and even personal opinions.

We can introduce the following rule: "A personal opinion published at Wikiversity shall be not easily provable to be false by field experts, neither shall it be an unfounded opinion, but shall provide some arguments (but not necessarily proofs) for the opinion)."

Another problem is that when somebody would publish his personal opinion, it is hard for his to follow NPOV, because he is not himself one of his opponents. So we should explicitly state: "Personal opinions can be published as original research. When publishing somebody's opinion as original research, it is allowed to omit opposing views in the hope that these may be added later." --VictorPorton (talk) 18:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)

特別計畫委員會第2006-39A號決議案

特別計畫委員會建議建立一個維基學院測試計畫,使用wikiversity.org網域,並依據其適用範圍,從8月起開始執行。

該計畫將致力於收集自由的多語言教育資源,且支持社群一同使用這些資源進行教學與學習。

在測試階段,該計畫將會執行6個月,此期間將會制訂未來使用此網站的潛在指引,包含合作研究等相關指引,並將會在該測試維基網站進行運用。

這些指引將會在測試階段結束時,由特別計畫委員會進行審核(來源)。

2006年8月14日理事會的指示

來源,作者為理事會成員Anthere Anthere

  • ……应该开发准则,特别是在合作研究方面,我们希望这些指导方针尽可能地在测试版(特别是合作研究)上开发,以便所有的语言共享一个共同目标和一些普遍的不容忽视的规则。
  • 在这6个月的时间里,这个项目将会被审查,尤其是合作研究的问题是合格的,如果可能的话,可以确定测试阶段是否结束。

參見

Wikiversity Policies
Research

Research Guidelines
Scope of Research
Review Board

This box: view  talk  edit
  • 研究方針
    • 維基學院的評議會────正式同儕審查
  • Research-related pages
    • 原创研究——使用文献综述和/或除了文献综述之外的方法,研究一个主题。
    • 二手来源——使用文献综述的方法研究一个话题。